![]() I don't know what the difference on an intel based chip would be, but I'd bet it's even higher. Average frames are up 17% and min frames are up almost 10%, even with a tweaked config in FSX Acceleration at 1440P. So, there seems to be better optimization as they suggested. ![]() So, min frames went from 25 to 27( 8% improvement), Max frames went from 77 to 95( 23% improvement), and Average frames when from 53 to 62( 17% improvement). Then I ran the steam version, same mission and got these numbers: I ran stock(I do have a tweaked config for my system, regularly see 100% usage across all 8 cores) first and got these numbers: My system is as R9_290 crossfire(disabled for this test)Ģ7" 1440P Qnix 2710 monitor running at 90hz I didn't change view at any time or pan the camera around,and flew mostly with trim and throttle for a smooth flight. So I felt that FSX steam edition was running better for me than the original FSX download I have from GFWL, so I broke out fraps and ran a benchmark. Descending towards Salzsburg by /u/Santi871.IRC : freenode #reddit-flightsim #upvoteva Flight Sim Internet RadioĪVSIM Library (freeware - account required) More about our rules can be found here: /r/flightsim/about/rules. Let's have a chat about spam and self-promotionĪbsolutely no advertising or self-promotion outside of the weekly self-promotion thread.Please see this threads for more information: ![]() Self-promotion is limited to the weekly self-promotion thread onlyĪccounts younger than 12 hours are now permitted to post both comments and submissions ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |